As financial advisors increasingly explore alternative fee structures beyond the traditional 1 percent of assets model, they are reshaping how they address clients' primary concerns.

According to recent data from the Investment Adviser Association and National Regulatory Services, nearly all registered investment advisory firms rely on assets under management (AUM) fees, but almost half also offer fixed or hourly rates. The debate over fee structures, a central issue in the industry, can be complex and divisive, often leaving clients bewildered. However, insights from industry statistics, anonymous discussions on platforms like Reddit, and affluent investor focus groups reveal a nuanced landscape beyond the binary choice of AUM versus retainer fees.

According to FinancialPlanning.com, recent data suggests that both financial advisors and consumers are increasingly receptive to flat fees and transparent disclosures regarding costs. A survey conducted by consulting firm Cerulli Associates revealed that cost transparency and general expenses ranked as the top two concerns among potential affluent investor clients when considering hiring an advisor. Among respondents, 46 percent cited cost transparency as a significant concern, while 28 percent expressed worries about general expenses. However, for clients already engaged with an advisor, only 11 percent reported insufficient transparency in expenses, with just 12 percent considering fees too high.

Additionally, the prevalence of non-AUM fees is growing steadily, indicating a shift in industry dynamics. Over the past decade, the proportion of SEC-registered RIAs charging flat or fixed fees increased by 3.4 percent to 44.9 percent, while those charging hourly rates rose by 1.7 percent to 29.5 percent, according to the latest RIA snapshot.

Financial Advisor Transitions consults advisors nationwide to explore employment transition options and to preserve and protect their practice in any transition that they
make.